Assessment of global health programs at accredited dental schools in the United States.

PURPOSE: Oral diseases pose a serious global health challenge. As such, dental education must integrate global health with emphasis on scalable and sustainable solutions. The aim of our study was to capture the scope of global health programs offered to dental students in the United States and identify ways in which dental schools may modify their curricula to improve global health knowledge and accessibility for students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this cross-sectional, cohort study, the investigators sent a confidential and electronic survey to 213 faculty members at the 67 accredited dental schools in the United States. This voluntary survey was distributed in September and October of 2020 with answers being self-reported. RESULTS: A total of 40 different schools are represented in this study, representing 59.7% of accredited dental schools in the United States. Using descriptive statistics, the results present existing global health opportunities, barriers preventing schools from expanding global health education, and necessary resources that schools without a program need to establish one. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate promising findings, in relation to global health being a vital part of dental education. However, there is an urgent need for enhanced and more structured education in this space. As the global burden of oral disease contributes to the degree and severity of noncommunicable diseases worldwide, the development of a sustainable, preventive primary care approach must integrate oral health, making future dental professionals a crucial component of global health.

Simulation capacity building in rural Indian hospitals: a 1-year follow-up qualitative analysis.

Introduction: The benefits of simulation-based medical training are well described. The most effective way to plant and scale simulation training in rural locations remains undescribed. We sought to plant simulation training programmes for anaesthesia emergencies in two rural Indian hospitals. Methods: Two Indian consultant anaesthetists without experience in medical simulation underwent a 3-day course at the Boston Children's Hospital's (BCH) Simulator Program. They returned to their institutions and launched simulation programmes with an airway manikin and mock patient monitor. The 1-year experience was evaluated using individual, in-depth interviews of simulation facilitators. Three staff members (responsible for facilitating medical simulations over the prior year) at two rural hospitals in India were interviewed. None attended the BCH training; instead, they received on-the-job training from the BCH-trained, consultant anaesthetist colleagues. Results: Successes included organisational adoption of simulation training with exercises 1 year after the initial BCH-training, increased interdisciplinary teamwork and improved clinical competency in managing emergencies. Barriers to effective, local implementation of simulation programmes fell into three categories: time required to run simulations, fixed and rigid roles, and variable resources. Thematic improvement requests were for standardised resources to help train simulation facilitators and demonstrate to participants a well-run simulation, in addition to context-sensitive scenarios. Conclusion: An in-person training of simulation facilitators to promote medical simulation programmes in rural hospitals produced ongoing simulation programmes 1 year later. In order to make these programmes sustainable, however, increased investment in developing simulation facilitators is required. In particular, simulation facilitators must be prepared to formally train other simulation facilitators, too.

Surgathon: a new model for creating a surgical innovation ecosystem in low-resource settings.

Innovation ecosystems and emerging technologies can potentially accelerate the access to safe, affordable surgical care in low-resource settings. There is a need to develop localised innovation ecosystems that can establish an initial culture and catalyse the creation, adoption and diffusion of innovation. The surgathon model outlines one approach to seeding surgical innovation ecosystems. International academic institutions collaborated on six global surgery, innovation and ethics-themed hackathons ('surgathons') across India and Rwanda between 2016 and 2019. Over 1598 local multidisciplinary students participated, learning about challenges in the delivery of surgical care and ideating solutions that could leverage appropriate technology and resources for impact. Pursuing student ideas and evaluating their implementation past the surgathons continues to be an active effort. Surgathons have unfolded in different permutations based on local faculty, institution and health system context. The surgathon model is a novel method of priority setting challenges in global surgery and utilises locally driven expertise and innovation capacity to derive ethical solutions. The model offers a path for low-resource setting students and faculty to learn, advocate and innovate for improved surgical care.